Chop the Trees!
Enter the Cherry Tree Backlash. The Stamford Advocate ran an article on Sunday about this being the last year before the Cherry Trees are removed from Mill River Park as part of a larger renovation. The trees were a gift from a Japanese immigrant & businessman 50 years ago.
The Advocate article was half assed and almost looking to stir up indignation. It stated the trees weren’t that healthy would be expensive to transplant, and would be replaced on the projects completion in 2010. Of course you are going to rile up the mob like that, both the reasonable and the ridiculous among them. To the reasonable, it looks like the city is chopping 20-odd trees down in a park and maybe they can consider tweaks in the plan to save them.
What the article didn’t go into is the details of the work slated for the park that will require the trees to come down. This is one of the first stages in creating a park/ greenway that will stretch from the sound to Scalzi Park. Central to the plan is the middle section of the park where the cherry tress line a man made pond created by the dammed river The dam stops natural flow of the river, contributes to flooding upstream, stops fish from swimming upriver, and creates scum filled stagnate water enjoyed primarily by Canadian Geese and the occasional shopping cart. The concrete walls that surround the pond stop wildlife from reaching the stream and people from getting anywhere close to the water. The Army Corp of Engineers have completed plans to remove the dam and the concrete walls and return the stream to it’s natural state, with native vegetation and trails.
In short you are replacing this…
with this…
and this…
The Mill River Collaborative explains this further on their website. $4MM of the costs are offset with federal funding. Removing the walls and the dam unfortunately bring down the cherry trees that are planted too close to their edge, but new ones will be planted in the reconfigured park. I think if the public was aware of this, they’d understand and probably fully support a plan that helps create a central park that replaces an unnatural design with an environmentally sensitive one.
There’s a group who won’t be happy knowing the broader implications anyways. You can already see that in some of the letters to the Advocate. It’s a Donald Trump plot! It’s trying to make Stamford New York! Yeah, keep your nice public parks New York, we want shitty ones that only look decent when driving past at 30 mph!
Removal of the trees isn’t any disrespect to their deceased giver. It doesn’t erase the 50 years the city had with them. They served the park then, the new & improved Mill River park will serve the city going forward.
11 comments :
Love the sarcasm. Works well here. The new plans look lovely, but I can still see a few old timers having a problem with the removal.
Well put.
The greenway is an exciting project for Stamford. It's a shame that the trees have to go, but that stretch of park is currently incredibly underutilized. The Mill River plans will create a vibrant downtown destination that can only help Stamford to become a better city.
I share your assessment of the letters to the Advocate. Have you forayed into the Topix forums yet? Oy vay. The comments do not speak well for the intelligence level of our fair city.
Topix has a lot of crazies. They love TO USE ALL CAPS AND LOTS OF !!!!! That's web for I'M F#%*ING NUTS!!!
Ah but the crazies were able to save the poor scraggly trees in front of the Government Center - why do you think they won't be able to save the cherry trees?
I don't think they can stop it.
1. Mill River park is run by a private organization.
2. It's already funded.
3. There is no way to save the trees within the current plan to remove the dam and restore the river. You'd have to scrap that plan and scrap 10 years of work and millions of dollars spent in design and planning.
4. I'm sure there are more people in favor of it than opposed to it.
This isn't a new revelation either. This has been debated and mentioned in the paper numerous times before.
God, this blog is so much more interesting than an Advocate article! I liked your assessment of the dam/wildlife in the 3rd to last Paragraph.
So why is it run by a private org? Is it not a public park?
I don't remember exactly why. Has something to do with it being easier to raise private funds to pay for it. Central Park in NYC is set up the same way.
JT I assume you are a lawyer or somehow connected with the development as you seem to possess a lot of information about the park/greenway. Is this true?
the city of stamford lists Mill River Park as a city park but it is run by a private organization...I am confused.
http://www.cityofstamford.org/filestorage/25/52/138/164/711/ParksList07.pdf
Maybe we can remove everything historic and/or with character and make all of stamford look like a big barnes and noble/chang's/cvs/dunkin donuts/stop and shop strip mall... anywhere USA. That's why you pay the big bucks to live here and not Des Moines..oh wait are we in Cincinnati or is this Tampa? Can't tell it all looks the homogenized same. Nice work Trump Toys.
Its run by something called the Mill River Conservatory. I don't know the legal ins and outs of what that means to be honest. The Board of Reps voted to hand operations to them. Same deal as the Old Town Hall.
I'm not connected to the development, just excited about it. I live in walking distance, along with many others from downtown, the westside, & hubbard heights. I know many of the details because I read about it in the newspaper 2 years ago and found a website for the park www.millriver.info. These aren't secret plans. They are all out there for anyone who can type into a Google toolbar. They have a powerpoint where you can read about the plan. Check it out, I'm guessing you might change your mind about the park if you read more about it. If you look at the plan in its entirety, its actually something that will help make Stamford more unique, not less unique.
I think the city could do more to educate the public. on the plans. The Advocate seems to have some agenda against it, especially when they run a giant photo of the trees on the cover today with the headline "Final Season for the Cherry Trees?" and captain saying their removal is an effort to turn the park into Stamford's version of "Central Park". Anything that compares Stamford to New York (I can go on how absurd that comparison is) is a code word to get certain people riled up.
Want to know why there are all the chains you are complaining about? Because the public overwhelming supports them by shopping there. Simple as that. The mall restaurants are packed and the surrounding ones are empty, sad but true. Supply and demand, developers only filling the demand of the public. HArd to believe, but the chains existed before Trump.
Have you driven thru Milford, Norwalk, thats chain-ville. Stamford has some attempt at a mixed use downtown.
Post a Comment